Skip to main content

California · § 4055 Explained

How California calculates child support

California uses an algebraic K-factor formula under Cal. Fam. Code § 4055, last updated by SB 343 effective September 1, 2024.

Overview

How California calculates child support

Most U.S. states use an Income Shares model — they combine both parents' incomes, look up a base amount from a schedule table, and split the result proportionally. California does not. Instead, it uses a single algebraic equation that factors in both parents' net disposable income (income after taxes and deductions) and the high earner's custody time-share.

Net income is computed from gross using each parent's tax situation — filing status, dependents, FICA, and allowable deductions per § 4059. No schedule table is involved.

The formula

CS = K × [HN − (H% × TN)]

Each variable defined:

CSMonthly child support amount (one child)
KK-factor — allocates combined income to child support, adjusted for custody time (§ 4055(b)(3))
HNHigh earner's net monthly disposable income (§ 4059)
H%High earner's percentage of primary physical responsibility — their share of custody time (0–100%)
TNTotal combined net monthly disposable income of both parents

Sign rule (§ 4055(b)(5)): If CS > 0, the high earner pays the lower earner. If CS < 0, the lower earner pays the higher earner. This handles the case where the higher earner also has significantly more custody time.

2024 update

What changed with SB 343

California's K-factor hadn't been updated since 1992 — until SB 343, which took effect September 1, 2024.

The change: the formula for K when the high earner has more than 50% custodywas corrected to be symmetric. Before SB 343:

K = (1 + H%) × fraction(TN)

After SB 343 (post-September 1, 2024):

If H% ≤ 50%: K = (1 + H%) × fraction(TN)
If H% > 50%: K = (2 − H%) × fraction(TN)

The practical effect: at any given H%, the K-factor is now symmetric around 50%. A parent with 20% custody produces the same K as one with 80% custody. Most online calculators still use the pre-2024 formula and will overstate support when the high earner has more than 50% custody.

Net income

What "net disposable income" means

California computes child support from net income, not gross. Each parent's gross income is reduced by the deductions listed in § 4059:

  • § 4059(a) — Federal and California income taxes, based on filing status and dependents
  • § 4059(b) — FICA (Social Security 6.2% + Medicare 1.45%), or self-employment tax (15.3% on 92.35% of income)
  • § 4059(c) — Mandatory union dues and retirement contributions required as a condition of employment
  • § 4059(d) — Health and disability insurance premiums for children; CA SDI
  • § 4059(e) — Other court-ordered child or spousal support paid to non-parties

This is why two parents with the same gross income can have very different child support obligations — a single filer with no dependents pays significantly more tax than a head-of-household filer with multiple dependents.

K-factor

Custody time and the K-factor

The K-factor converts raw net income into an allocation for child support. It has two parts: a base fraction that scales with combined income (TN), and a multiplier that adjusts for the high earner's custody time (H%).

The fraction(TN) function is a piecewise formula from § 4055(b)(3):

TN $0–$2,9000.165 + TN / 82,857
TN $2,901–$5,0000.131 + TN / 42,149
TN $5,001–$10,0000.250 (constant)
TN $10,001–$15,0000.10 + 1,499 / TN
TN over $15,0000.12 + 1,200 / TN

Example from the statute: fraction(1,000) ≈ 0.177; K(H% = 20%, TN = $1,000) ≈ 0.21.

Multiple children

Multi-child multipliers

For more than one child, the one-child support amount is multiplied by a factor from § 4055(b)(4):

1 child
×1.000
2 children
×1.600
3 children
×2.000
4 children
×2.300
5 children
×2.500
6 children
×2.625
7 children
×2.750
8 children
×2.813
9 children
×2.844
10 children
×2.860

Per § 4055(b)(8), the court may also allocate support per child: the first child's share equals the one-child amount; the second child's share equals the difference between the two-child and one-child totals; and so on.

Low income

Low-income adjustment (§ 4055(b)(7))

A rebuttable presumption applies when the obligor's net monthly income is below the amount earned working full-time at California minimum wage ($16.50/hr × 40 hrs × 52 wks ÷ 12 ≈ $2,860/month in 2025).

The maximum reduction is:

adjustedCS = CS × (obligorNetIncome ÷ minWageMonthly)

Courts may apply a smaller reduction than the maximum if the standard adjustment would be unjust or inappropriate. The adjustment is in the obligor's favor, not the obligee's.

High earners

High-earner deviation (§ 4057(b)(3))

When the obligor earns significantly more than average, courts may deviate downward from the guideline if the formula amount exceeds the children's actual needs. This is a discretionary deviation — the guideline amount is still presumed correct; the high-earning parent must overcome that presumption.

Our calculator flags a warning when the obligor's gross monthly income exceeds $20,000.

Limitations

What this calculator doesn't cover

  • Hardship deductions (§§ 4070–4073) — catastrophic losses, minimum basic needs of additional children
  • Job-related expenses as court discretion deductions (§ 4059(f))
  • Itemized tax deductions — calculator always uses the standard deduction
  • Federal Child Tax Credit phase-out at higher income levels
  • Different timeshare percentages for different children
  • Imputed income for voluntarily unemployed or underemployed parents
  • Agreement-based deviations and judicial discretion generally

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Does California use gross or net income?+

Net. Cal. Fam. Code § 4059 requires computing taxes, FICA, and allowable deductions from gross income first. The formula then operates on the resulting net disposable income.

What is the K-factor?+

K is a multiplier that converts combined net income into a child support allocation. It increases with custody time (up to 50%) and decreases beyond that, reflecting that a parent who has the children more also directly bears more of their costs.

50/50 custody — does anyone owe support?+

Usually yes, if incomes are unequal. Even at exactly 50% custody, the higher earner typically still owes support because the formula accounts for income disparity, not just time split.

Why is this different from the official DCSS calculator?+

The official DCSS Guideline Calculator (DissoMaster) uses a more comprehensive tax engine with itemized deductions, actual withholding tables, and AMT calculations. Our calculator uses simplified 2025 tax brackets with standard deduction — the result may differ by a few percent. Always verify with the official tool before filing.

How do add-ons work?+

Work-related childcare (§ 4061) is mandatory if both parents work; courts allocate it proportionally to income. Uninsured healthcare costs (§ 4062) are typically split 50/50 unless otherwise ordered. These are in addition to — not part of — the base support amount.

Sources

Official references

Open the California calculator →